Tag: deliberative mini public

Citizens’ jury in Voxnadalen: residents’ priorities for municipally-owned forests

In autumn 2024, 22 residents from Ljusdal, Ovanåker, and Bollnäs gathered to discuss the future of municipally-owned forests within the Voxnadalen Biosphere Reserve. Their task was to weigh the many values of the forest and recommend how these should be prioritized and managed. The result is an important indicator of how local citizens view forests and forestry, as well as democratic processes in landscape management.

Participants listen to presentations. Photo: Judith Lundberg-Felten

Broad participation

The citizens’ jury, which took place over two days in Alfta, Ovanåker municipality, was carried out through a stratified random selection from a pool of 5,000 invitees. The selection aimed to reflect the diversity of the population. Participants were compensated for their time and provided access to expert knowledge on the subject.

The central question guiding the jury’s work was:

Which of the forest’s various values should be prioritized in municipal forests, and how should they be managed to achieve these values?

Residents’ priorities: recreation, biodiversity, and identity

After discussions and knowledge-sharing, a majority of participants agreed that the municipality should primarily prioritize creating spaces for recreation, strengthening biodiversity, and preserving and developing regional identity in its forests.

Other important values highlighted included climate benefits, opportunities for berry and mushroom picking, consideration for future generations, tourism, and local employment. In contrast, economic values such as income, hunting, timber production, and raw materials for industry were generally deprioritized by most participants, though still considered important by some.

An especially interesting observation was that values linked to exploitation and the local economy increased in priority during the process, suggesting that discussion contributed to a more nuanced understanding among participants.

Visit to the forest. Photo: Johan Hammerlund

Opposition to clear-cutting and support for local benefits

After lectures and small-group discussions, the jury examined different forest management methods. A clear majority expressed opposition to clear-cutting in municipally-owned forests. There was also strong support for:

  • Timber from these forests being used locally
  • The proportion of protected forest increasing
  • Forests being made more accessible to residents
  • Municipalities testing new and innovative forestry methods

The jury emphasized the need to balance ecological, social, and economic goals in forest management. Forests are not seen merely as an economic resource, but also as a place for quality of life, ecosystem services, and cultural identity.

Lessons from the process

The jury’s work was evaluated both internally and by external stakeholders. The deliberative method proved capable of handling complex issues in a constructive and informed way. Politicians and officials particularly highlighted the breadth of perspectives contributed by the citizen’s jury, in contrast to more traditional consultation methods.

However, the method was considered resource-intensive, with a cost of about SEK 500,000, covering process management, participant recruitment, compensation, and more. At the same time, it was seen as valuable and with strong potential for application in other policy areas, especially where complex interests are at stake.

Carrying out the process within the framework of a biosphere reserve was judged to be crucial for both implementation and continued follow-up. The biosphere reserve’s networks, knowledge, and long-term perspective enabled broader anchoring of the jury’s results.

Participants in group discussions during the jury process

A shared vision for sustainable municipal forestry

As a conclusion, participants were asked to formulate individual visions for the future of Voxnadalen. These were compiled into a shared vision approved by the entire jury:

“n a future Voxnadalen and the wider areas of Ljusdal, Ovanåker, and Bollnäs, we create a sustainable and profitable relationship with forest resources, where all stakeholders are included.

The vision emphasizes that municipalities should encourage residents to spend time in the forest for greater well-being, arrange cultural events and activities in forest environments, increase self-sufficiency, and promote reuse and everyday experiences instead of consumption. Special focus was placed on moving parts of schooling into nature, where children can learn about the values of the forest and gain insights from those who have worked in it. Involving children and young people in responsible forestry was considered central to achieving a better balance between ecological, economic, and social values.

The report and process were carried out in collaboration with the Voxnadalen Biosphere Reserve and serve as an example of how UNESCO biosphere reserves can function as arenas for experimental and inclusive community development.

Download the report here (in Swedish):

Report from Day 2 of the Citizens’ Jury on municipally-owned forests in Voxnadalen

What values should we prioritize in municipally-owned forests, and what forest management methods can best create these values? These are the questions that the Voxnadalen Citizens’ Jury was tasked with addressing. The forests that were discussed in this process are owned by Bollnäs, Ljusdal, and Ovanåker municipalities.

On November 23 2024, the participants of the Voxnadalen Citizens’ Jury gathered for a second time at Hälsingegård Ol-Anders in Alfta, filled with expectations and reflections from the first meeting that took place two weeks earlier. The first meeting focused on ecosystem services and sparked many thoughts, and there was eagerness in the room on day two to continue the discussions.

Människor runt ett bord diskuterar vid andra träffen av medborgarrådet om skogen
Discussion about the forests during the day’s meeting at Hälsingegård Ol-Anders

Forest Management and Administration

The second day focused on the management of the forests. Participants listened to presentations from representatives of all three municipalities, who explained their current forestry practices. There was a lot of interest from the audience and many questions.

These discussions were followed by a overview presentation of different forest management methods. Erik Nyberg from Sveaskog spoke about clear-cut forestry, Annevi Sjöberg from Plockhugget AB described close-to-nature/continuous-cover forestry, Anna Jansson from the County Administrative Board of Gävleborg talked about nature conservation, and Erik Lundh from Bollnäs municipality outlined the municipalities’ planning work, which sometimes includes forest land development.

Deliberations and Conclusions

The participants had a strong interest in the forest as a place for culture and education. They described the forests as an important place for children and young people to experience and learn from. Many highlighted that the forestry industry is important for the regional and national economy, and discussions frequently focused on how this affects other values of the forests, such as biodiversity. The role of forests in replacing fossil-based products and fuels led to reflections on whether reducing consumption should actually be the priority. The forest’s role as a source of healing during difficult times in life was also a recurring theme.

There was a curiosity among the participants about alternative forest management methods (non-clear cut methods), and the presentation on close-to-nature and continuous-cover forestry generated considerable enthusiasm, even though there was some skepticism about the ability of this method to generate financial income.

Post-it lappar på ett stort pappersark med en tabell som deltagarna har använt för att lyfta fram olika aspekter om skogsbruk
Notes on advantages and disadvantages of different forest management methods

Participants also discussed the municipalities’ roles in developing new management methods. Given that the current income from municipal forests is relatively low, it was considered reasonable to experiment with methods that can address multiple forest values appreciated by the residents. Many also expressed the view that more of the timber from municipal forests should be used locally, although some doubted the efficiency of this approach due to the current lack of infrastructure for processing and selling forest products.

At the end of the day, participants presented their main arguments for or against the various management methods and explained their reasoning. Several politicians and officials from the respective municipalities were present to hear the results.

The results of the process are now being compiled and will be presented to all interested parties at Voxnadalen Biosphere Reserve’s annual open meeting, which will take place in the spring of 2025.

Inspelningsapparater liggandes på ett bord. Alla samtal spelas in för att analysera processen.
All discussions were recorded and will now be analysed to feed into the research process

Research on the Process

Several LANDPATHS researchers from Stockholm University, Uppsala University, and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences observed the process and documented how it functioned in practice.

The researchers are interested in better understanding how this type of local dialogue and deliberative decision-making can support the creation and management of multifunctional landscapes.

Rummet med deltagare som diskuterar vid tre olika bord
In-depth discussions during day two

What is a Citizens’ Jury?

A Citizens’ Jury involves a randomly selected group of citizens who listen to various perspectives, opinions, and expert knowledge on a matter of public interest and then engage in in-depth discussions. This method differs from other forms of citizen engagement, such as citizen dialogues. In a Citizens’ Jury, participants are chosen based on criteria that ensure broad representation of the general public within a small group. The process usually concludes with a collective decision or set of recommendations. These types of processes have been employed in several countries to address complex issues, including sustainable development and climate change.

Citizens’ Jury on the Nämdö archipelago Biosphere Reserve underway

On Saturday 19 October, the participants in Nämdöskärgården’s citizens’ council gathered for the first time. The council brought together 25 citizens with different opinions and connections to the Nämdöskärgården. Some were year-round residents while others were part-time or summer residents. After an educational and information-rich first day, the preparations for the next gathering, which will take place on November 16, now begin.

This blog post is an English translation of an article we wrote on the Nämdö Green Archipelago (NGA) website (see the NGA article in Swedish).

The citizens’ jury in the Nämdö archipelago connects with the process of establishing a Biosphere Reserve around Nämdö and its surrounding islands. A collaboration between LANDPATHS and Nämdö Green Archipelago, the citizens’ jury is tasked with generating input on the future development of the archipelago, with a specific focus on which initiatives should be prioritized in the local actors’ continued work to establish the biosphere area.

During the first day, the participants learned more about what a Biosphere Reserve is and listened to different perspectives on the challenges and opportunities the faced in Nämdö. 

Speakers during the first day: 

  • Nämdö Archipelago Biosphere Reserve, Ann Aldeheim, Nämdö Green Archipelago
  • Preserve on land and below the surface, Elin Dahlgren, SLU
  • Community service and development, Anna Gabrielsson, Värmdö municipality
  • Infrastructure and transport, Sune Fogelström
  • Business and tourism, Martin Rosén, Stavsnäs Båttaxi
  • Social meeting places and culture, Kerstin Sonnbäck, Lower Dalälven Biosphere Reserve

After each presentation, the participants had the opportunity to reflect in small groups on the presented perspectives, ask questions and discuss their views and experiences. Afterwards, the participants were encouraged to write a future vision to describe how they imagine the Nämdö archipelago in the coming years. The day ended with shared reflections and impressions from the day, as well as expectations for the future.

With information, experiences and reflections from the first day, the group will gather again on Saturday 16 November. The focus of the second day will be on delving into the different perspectives, and prioritising and analysing the advantages and disadvantages of different efforts. 

The result of the citizens’ jury will form the basis for Nämdö Green Archipelago’s continued work to establish a biosphere area in the landscape.

A big thank you to all participants for your time and commitment!

More information about the citizen jury method

In a citizens’ jury, citizens are selected according to criteria that ensure a broad representation of the public in a small group. Over several days, the participants hear different perspectives, opinions and expert knowledge, and then get to discuss the issue in depth. The process usually ends with a joint conclusion or recommendations. Citizens are compensated for their participation in this process.

For more information about the citizens’ juries taking place within LANDPATHS, contact Tim Daw (leader of the Barriers and opportunities for change project).

© 2025 LANDPATHS

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑

Skip to content